Buchanan County Booking Activity 3/26/2013

Posted 2 years ago

By Post Staff

AIS-2013-ani
Here’s the latest booking activity from the Buchanan County Jail. All persons included in this post are innocent of crimes until proven guilty in a court of law.

These are courtesy photos. This information is provided by the Buchanan County Sheriff’s Office and is not criminal history.

The St Joseph Post assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, or completeness, of this information.


  • not st. joseph proud

    bad parent, sex offender, thief, nasty ass rapist, all this is missing is the drug head and the drunk driver.

    Current score: 9
  • coach

    that just about somes up st jo as a whole! not proud ! u forgot rude also.

    Current score: 4
  • selfdestruct

    hey another of the wonderful despain in jail. and wouldnt you know its for a sex crime

    Current score: 2
  • blackhat

    Again Josh? C’Mon Man

    Current score: 2
    • really

      bad enough hes on the streets, but no not again he was revoked and they always put the original charge. still a sicko

      Current score: 0
  • do you really know

    Any one who knows Mr. Norman knows this was not a true “rape” AND he is not a horrible person. You all have your opinions but I will guarantee your judgements are made on untrue statements. The laws are black and white in this situation and this was not a malicious act in any way. Violation for not writing a paper; getting a ride with his parents; think what you will, be careful on your judgement someone may be judging you some day.

    Current score: 3
    • blackhat

      I do know Mr. Norman, and while he’s not a “horrible person” he’s still kind of a freak. He gave the girls a school a creeper vibe. He, on purpose, ran head first into a dumpster for no reason. And apparently messed with an underage CHILD. That’s a weirdo in my book.

      Current score: 0
      • blackhat

        HOLY CRAP!!! SHE WAS FIFTEEN!!!!!

        Current score: 0
  • heysuckstosuck.

    Just because your a “friend” or relative of Josh doesn’t mean you have to back him up because you don’t believe he is that “type” of person. Sure, I remember him he had a damn good voice in choir in highschool, and he was very nice to anyone. but that doesn’t mean antying
    he always looked at younger girls and put off that “creep” vibe. only Josh and the girl involved know the real story….. all I’m sayins is that I believe him to be capable of something like that.

    also I don’t know the whole story, but isn’t he married and has kids of his own??
    him where were his standards/character/morale when he was with the victim knowing he has a wife and kids…?

    Current score: 1
    • Cathy Norman

      I’m sure anyone is capable of what actually happened. Yes Mr. Norman has a wife and kids, the “victim” took care of the children and was well aware of that, with no concern for either wife or children. The “victim” was not a child and knew exactly what she was doing, as well.

      Current score: 1
      • well actually…

        the law makes children, children for a reason.
        if you are under 17 years of age, you are a child. if you cannot respect the laws and look at a “child” as an adult you deserve to be classified as a rapest because you knowingly are committing sex acts with A CHILD. your not an adult until you are 17 *some states 18* years of age. the law is the law, get over it.

        Current score: 4
        • Candy

          Well said!

          Current score: 2
      • Candy

        The “victim” was a child, in the eyes of the law, if he is facing Statutory Rape charges. A grown man knows and should say NO to a teenager even though she is willing to have sex with him. Not every man would succumb to the temptations of a 15 or 16 year old “girl”. A real man knows better.

        Current score: 5
        • Candy

          Throw the freakin book at him!

          Current score: 2
  • Sweet Daddy

    Anytime I post anything here its because I’m damm sure I can & no one will ever have an opportunity to judge me.

    Current score: 2
  • Unknown

    Wow a De Spain that’s not a women beater it’s better a sex offender.

    Current score: 0
  • well actually…

    so sick of people not understanding the LAW.
    CHILDREN ARE CHILDREN.
    IF THEY ARE UNDERAGE (no matter how mature you wanna believe they are in your sick mind) THEY ARE A CHILD.
    STOP LOOKING AT CHILDREN LIKE THEY ARE ADULTS!

    Current score: 4
  • heysuckstosuck.

    hypothetically……..even if the “victim” wasn’t a child
    he has still committed adultery….now correct me there if I’m wrong but God will judge him there.
    now when are we going to see the actual news article on this?
    I think anyone to look at someone under the age of 18 when you are plenty over 20 is just downright sick. under the age of 18 is still developing.
    point blank she is a child. babies shouldn’t be forced to participate in activities that make babies. even if they say “ok” they don’t know what they’re saying “ok” to!!!!

    Current score: 1
  • Kelley

    I don’t know the full story here and for the rest of you leaving nasty comments, you should be ashamed of yourselves since you don’t know the full story either. I understand this is a free forum and you can leave your opinions, but don’t be nasty if you don’t know the truth!!!!

    Current score: 1
  • Guilty

    Truth is, innocent until proven guilty….damn the bad luck it shows what there charged with too. So odds have it they’ve violated probation and are a repeat offender, if not somebody must have had enough evidence to get themselves a photo taken. On the repeat part I stated meaning any law probably broken to violate probation.

    Current score: 2
    • innocent until proven

      He was already proven guilty once…in fact he plead guilty so there is no question of his innocence or guilt this is just the forth or fifth time he has violated his probation.

      Current score: 1
  • Be Nasty

    Being nasty is in the photos, not the comments!!!

    Current score: 0